Jason Brendon Philip v The King
Case information | Jason Brendon Philip v The King SC 32/2022
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Search results for 20
Found 2660 items matching 20.
Case information | Jason Brendon Philip v The King SC 32/2022
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Case information | H v Minister of Immigration SC 104/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Synlait Milk Limited v New Zealand Industrial Park Limited and Ye Qing SC 50/2019
Supreme Court
Civil – Property Law Act 2007, s 317 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the appeal and declining to modify covenants burdening land owned by the appellant.
Case information | Quentin Woods v New Zealand Police SC 115/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Sentencing – Special conditions – Residential restrictions – Intensive monitoring – Sentencing Act 2002, s 93(2B) – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s 93(2B) of the Sentencing Act permits imposition of conditions similar…
Case information | International Consolidated Business Pty Limited v S C Johnson & Son Inc SC 32/2019
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent’s application to trademark of the word ZIPLOC to proceed to registration – Whether the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted s 68(2) of the Trade Marks Act 2002.
Case information | Brooke Christie Rolleston v The Queen SC 17/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether a member of the jury appeared biased – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Case information | Brandon James Roche v The Queen SC 18/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether a member of the jury appeared biased – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Case information | Northland Environmental Protection Society Incorporated v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries, Comptroller of Customs and The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Culture and Heritage SC 10/2018
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of the Forests Act 1949 and the Protected Objects Act 1975
Case information | Douglas Craig Schmuck v Opua Coastal Preservation Incorporated and Far North District Council SC 66/2018
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to the interpretation of the scope of easements – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by not relying on resource consents when examining the easements at issue – Whether the Court of Appeal er…
Case information | Mark Robert Sandman v Colin Charles McKay, Roger David Cann and David John Clark SC 35/2018
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them.