Search Results
Search results for 91
Found 942 items matching 91.
Major Gas Users' Group Inc v Commerce Commission
Case information | Major Gas Users' Group Inc v Commerce Commission [2024] NZHC 959
High Court
Decision of Public Interest
Major Gas Users’ Group Inc (MGUG) appealed two decisions of the Commerce Commission made under pt 4 of the Commerce Act 1986: one that amended the input methodologies for gas transmission and distribution services; and one that determined the default pric…
Attorney-General v Putua
Case information | Attorney-General v Putua [2024] NZCA 67
Court of Appeal
Decision of Public Interest
Mr Putua was arbitrarily detained for 33 days in breach of s 22 of the Bill of Rights Act. In the High Court he sought and was awarded compensation under the Bill of Rights Act. This case was an appeal, by the Attorney-General, against that decision. The …
Fences and Kerbs Limited v Peter Esmond Farrell and Simon Paul Rogan as liquidators of Contract Engineering Ltd
Case information | Fences and Kerbs Limited v Peter Esmond Farrell and Simon Paul Rogan as liquidators of Contract Engineering Ltd SC 80/2013
Supreme Court
Company law – Liquidation – Voidable transactions – Meaning of “gave value” under s 296(3)(c) of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether value must be given at the time payment is received from the company – Whether “new or additional value” must be provided at …
Hiway Stabilizers New Zealand Limited v Jeffrey Philip Meltzer and Lloyd James Hayward as liquidators of Window Holdings Limited
Case information | Hiway Stabilizers New Zealand Limited v Jeffrey Philip Meltzer and Lloyd James Hayward as liquidators of Window Holdings Limited SC 81/2013
Supreme Court
Company law – Liquidation – Voidable transactions – Meaning of “gave value” under s 296(3)(c) of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether value must be given at the time payment is received from the company – Whether “new or additional value” must be provided at …
William Patrick Jeffries v The Privacy Commissioner
Case information | William Patrick Jeffries v The Privacy Commissioner SC 5/2010
Supreme Court
Civil – Litigation privilege – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that unsolicited communication does not attract litigation privilege under s56 of the Evidence Act 2006 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in interpreting the word ‘person’ in s9…
Totara Investment Limited v Crismac Limited and Ulster Limited
Case information | Totara Investment Limited v Crismac Limited and Ulster Limited SC 75/2009
Supreme Court
Civil – Interpretation of a mortgage - Whether the Court of Appeal erred as a matter of fact and law in finding that cl 9.1(d) of the mortgage did not authorise the lender to obtain security over additional property.[2009] NZCA 369 CA 599/2008 21 Aug…
Malcolm Raymond Clarke v The Queen
Case information | Malcolm Raymond Clarke v The Queen SC 50/2016
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal against conviction – Whether the trial Judge ought to have directed the jury that the applicant did not have the burden of proving that the complainant had a motive t…
Te Rünanga-ä-iwi-o Ngäti Kahu v Far North District Council, Carrington Farms Limited, Carrington Estate Limited, Carrington Resort Limited.
Case information | Te Rünanga-ä-iwi-o Ngäti Kahu v Far North District Council, Carrington Farms Limited, Carrington Estate Limited, Carrington Resort Limited. SC 66/2013
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Resource Management – Resource Management Act 1991, ss 91, 94C, 104 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of s 94C – Whether the Court of Appeal misinterpreted the decision of the Supreme Court in Westfield (New Zealand)…
Acme Engineering Limited v Peter Esmond Farrell and Simon Paul Rogan as liquidators of Contract Engineering Ltd
Case information | Acme Engineering Limited v Peter Esmond Farrell and Simon Paul Rogan as liquidators of Contract Engineering Ltd SC 79/2013
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Company law – Liquidation – Voidable transactions – Meaning of “gave value” under s 296(3)(c) of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether value must be given at the time payment is received from the company – Whether “new or additional value” must be provided at …