Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Search results for 27
Found 2216 items matching 27.
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Mark Edward Lundy v The Queen SC 95/2018
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 385 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal against conviction under the proviso to s 385(1) despite finding that certain evidence presented at trial was inadmissible.
Case information | Cheyman Lee Mitchell v New Zealand Police SC 116/2021
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Case information | H v Minister of Immigration SC 104/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | TUV v The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force SC 14/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | R (SC 1/2019) V The Queen SC 1/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Case information | Craig Duthie and Kirsten Taylor-Ruiterman, and DRK Chartered Accountants Limited v Denise Michelle Roose, and Denise Developments Limited, and DMR Development Limited SC 10/2017
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the causes of action brought by the respondents in tort were not time barred.
Case information | Anna Elizabeth Osborne and Sonya Lynne Rockhouse v Worksafe New Zealand and District Court at Wellington SC 23/2017
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Judicial review – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the first respondent had not exercised its prosecutorial discretion unlawfully or unreasonably – Whether the dismissal of charges by the second respondent was ultra vires b…
Case information | Lakes International Golf Management Limited and The Lakes International Golf Course Limited v Hartley Clendon Vincent SC 99/2016
Supreme Court
Civil Proceedings – Whether the Court of Appeal adopted the correct approach to the use of extrinsic evidence when interpreting a covenant. [2016] NZCA 382 CA 699/2015
Case information | Auckland Council v Wendco (NZ) Limited and Wiri Licensing Trust SC 14/2016
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Resource Management Act 1991, s 95E – Whether the Court of Appeal interpreted the phrase “related to” in s 95E too broadly – Whether the first respondent is an affected person in terms of the second respondent’s application for resource con…