Search Results
Search results for 84
Found 970 items matching 84.
[2020] NZSC 83
[2015] NZSC 124
[2014] NZSC 153
A R Poynter v The Commerce Commission
Case information | A R Poynter v The Commerce Commission SC 32/2009
Supreme Court
Civil – Commerce Act – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s 4 is not an exhaustive statement of the circumstances in which the provisions of the Act apply to overseas conduct – Whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to find that the conduct …
Margot Crequer v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Case information | Margot Crequer v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development SC 69/2014
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Civil procedure – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the application for an extension of time to file a case on appeal and apply for a hearing date.[2014] NZCA 284 CA 84/2013.
Ifeanyi Jude Akulue v The Queen
Case information | Ifeanyi Jude Akulue v The Queen SC 38/2013
Supreme Court
Pretrial ruling.[2013] NZCA 84 CA 675/2012
AVM v The Queen
Case information | AVM v The Queen SC 34/2011
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal – Evidence Act 2006, ss 37 and 85 – Whether Crown ought to have disclosed material in its possession regarding expert witness to defence, in order to prevent ‘trial by ambush’ – Whether cross-examination of expert was in substance a challenge to …
Casata Limited v General Distributors Limited
Case information | Casata Limited v General Distributors Limited SC 26/2005
Supreme Court
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of the costs regime under the Arbitration Act 1996 - whether the Court of Appeal held correctly that the arbitral tribunal had erred in law in not considering party costs in the reward…
Jesse Michael Guild
Case information | Jesse Michael Guild SC CRI 17/2004
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal appeal against conviction - whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to the use of similar fact evidence - whether a substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred. CA84/04 7 April 2004CA210/04 11 October 2004