Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Search results for 18
Found 2724 items matching 18.
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Frucor Suntory New Zealand Limited SC 92/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Maythem Kamil Radhi v District Court at Manukau and The Commonwealth of Australia SC 57/2017
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Extradition Act 1999, s 48 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that it would not be unjust or oppressive to extradite the applicant – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the application to adduce further evidence.
Case information | Janet Elsie Lowe v Director General of Health, Ministry of Health and Chief Executive, Capital and Coast District Health Board SC 97/2016
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – Employment Relations Act 2000, s 5 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the term “engaged” in the definition of “homeworker” in s 5 – Whether the Court of Appeal acted outside its jurisdiction. [2016…
Case information | ASG v Harlene Hayne SC 61/2016
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – Criminal procedure Act, s 200 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of "publication" under s 200 – Was information relied on by the employer obtained contrary to an order made under s 200 and if so, does it matter. [201…
Case information | Mark Arnold Clayton and others v Melanie Ann Clayton SC 23/2015
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Property (Relationships) Act 1976 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that a power of appointment could be relationship property under the Property (Relationships) Act – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that there had…
Case information | Lyonel Manurewa Te Pou Taniwha v The Queen SC 115/2015
Supreme Court
Criminal appeal – Whether a tailored demeanour direction should have been given at trial – Whether evidence of breach of a police safety order was admissible as propensity evidence and whether a “proper use” direction was required in respect of that evide…
Case information | Melanie Ann Clayton v Mark Arnold Clayton and others SC 38/2015
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Property (Relationships) Act 1976 – Whether the Vaughan Road Property Trust was a sham trust or an illusory trust – Whether s 44 of the Property (Relationships) Act should apply to gifts and distributions made in relation to various trusts.…
Case information | Planet Kids Limited v Auckland Council SC 5/2013
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – frustration of purpose – whether the Court of Appeal erred in fact and law in finding that the settlement agreement between the parties was frustrated by the termination of the lease held by the appellant under a clause of the deed of lease…
Case information | Lisa Marie Colleen Mandic and Stephen Neil Dohnt SC 4/2011
Supreme Court
Civil – Interpretation of a Glasgow lease – Whether Court of Appeal erred in its approach and conclusions as to the interpretation of the lease’s particular rental review formula. [2010] NZCA 576 CA 787/2009 3 December 2010