Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Search results for 20
Found 2683 items matching 20.
Case information | Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand SC 79/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited v Brendan Miles Ross and Colleen Anne Ross SC 105/2019
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Civil procedure – Class actions – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that an opt-out procedure should be the norm for class actions in New Zealand – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that an opt-out approach was appropr…
Case information | Mark Edward Lundy v The Queen SC 95/2018
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 385 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal against conviction under the proviso to s 385(1) despite finding that certain evidence presented at trial was inadmissible.
Case information | Jason Brendon Philip v The King SC 32/2022
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Case information | H v Minister of Immigration SC 104/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | Synlait Milk Limited v New Zealand Industrial Park Limited and Ye Qing SC 50/2019
Supreme Court
Civil – Property Law Act 2007, s 317 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the appeal and declining to modify covenants burdening land owned by the appellant.
Case information | Quentin Woods v New Zealand Police SC 115/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Sentencing – Special conditions – Residential restrictions – Intensive monitoring – Sentencing Act 2002, s 93(2B) – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s 93(2B) of the Sentencing Act permits imposition of conditions similar…
Case information | International Consolidated Business Pty Limited v S C Johnson & Son Inc SC 32/2019
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent’s application to trademark of the word ZIPLOC to proceed to registration – Whether the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted s 68(2) of the Trade Marks Act 2002.
Case information | Brooke Christie Rolleston v The Queen SC 17/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether a member of the jury appeared biased – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Case information | Brandon James Roche v The Queen SC 18/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether a member of the jury appeared biased – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.