McGrath v Accident Compensation Corporation
Case information | McGrath v Accident Compensation Corporation SC 127/2010 [2011] NZSC 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Search results for 2010
Found 1806 items matching 2010.
Case information | McGrath v Accident Compensation Corporation SC 127/2010 [2011] NZSC 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | North Shore City Council v Body Corporate [2010] NZSC 158
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | Red Eagle Corporation Limited v Richard John Otley Ellis SC 72/2009
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – whether the respondent is liable under s 9 of the Fair Trading Act 1986 for passing on information about a third party which induced the appellant to enter into a contact with that third party[2009] NZCA 320 CA 713/2008 24 July 2009
Case information | The Queen v George Evans Gwaze SC 93/2009
Supreme Court
Criminal – Appeal against case stated decision – Whether Court of Appeal majority erred in concluding that the trial Judge’s decision to allow inadmissible hearsay “evidence” was an error of fact rather than an error of law and that therefore the case sta…
Case information | Deryck Joseph Morgan v The Queen SC 92/2008
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – aggravated robbery – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – previous inconsistent statement of hostile witness – actual statement not produced until re-examination because of oversight – whether Court of Appeal was correct …
Case information | Susan Couch v The Attorney-General SC 49/2006
Supreme Court
Civil – appeal against Court of Appeal judgment, striking out claims for misfeasance in public office and negligence – applicant surviving victim of attack in 2001 on Panmure RSA – Department of Corrections acknowledged errors undoubtedly occurred in the …
Case information | Ludgater Holdings Limited v Gerling Australia Insurance Company Pty Limited SC 92/2009
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying s 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936, namely whether the Court of Appeal erred in not finding that the respondent had a sufficient presence in New Zealand and whether the Court of Appeal erred in find…
Case information | Philip Wayne Hart v The Queen SC 74/2009
Supreme Court
Criminal appeal – appeal against conviction – convictions for sexual offending – the trial judge acceded to an application by the Crown for a prior consistent statement of the complainant to be admitted in terms of s 35(2) of the Evidence Act 2006 to rebu…
Case information | The Attorney-General of New Zealand v Mervyn Chapman SC 120/2009
Supreme Court
Civil – Crown liability for judicial breaches of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law by holding that the Attorney-General is the correct defendant in an action alleging breaches of the New Zealand Bill of Rig…
Case information | Edward Woodrow Collins v The Queen SC 110/2009
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal – Conspiracy to manufacture Class A drug – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial Judge gave proper jury directions on the evidence of co-conspirators – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in not ruling whether there was reason…