Search Results
Search results for 44
Found 1411 items matching 44.
[2017] NZSC 135
[2020] NZSC 42
Sportzone Motorcyles Limited (in liquidation) and Motor Trade Finances Limited v Commerce Commission
Case information | Sportzone Motorcyles Limited (in liquidation) and Motor Trade Finances Limited v Commerce Commission SC 40/2015
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of ss 41, 42 and 44. [2015] NZCA 78 CA 727/2013; CA 593/2014
D(SC 26/2018) v The Queen
Case information | D(SC 26/2018) v The Queen SC 26/2019
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether the appellant’s call to a mental health line should have been admitted at trial – Whether the appellant should have been permitted to lead evidence under Evidence Act 2006, s 44(1) – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissin…
Peter John Chambers v The Queen
Case information | Peter John Chambers v The Queen SC 118/2018
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by not admitting evidence under section 44 of the Evidence Act 2006.
Mark Arona v The Queen
Case information | Mark Arona v The Queen SC 98/2018
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by not admitting evidence under section 44 of the Evidence Act 2006.
C v The Queen
Case information | C v The Queen SC 75/2017
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, s 44 – Whether Court of Appeal erred in upholding a pre-trial ruling that evidence of sexual experience was not admissible.
Dennis Rangiaho Hohua v The Queen
Case information | Dennis Rangiaho Hohua v The Queen SC 59/2017
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, ss 37 and 44 – Whether the Courtof Appeal was correct to uphold the trial Judge’s ruling that evidence of anallegedly false prior complaint by the complainant was inadmissible at trial.
Mohammed Munif Sahib v The Queen
Case information | Mohammed Munif Sahib v The Queen SC 49/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether propensity evidence was correctly admitted – Whether s 44 of the Evidence Act 2006 was applied correctly by the trial judge.[2015] NZCA 112 CA 252/2014