Search Results
Search results for 72
Found 1143 items matching 72.
[2020] NZSC 72
Mita Michael Ririnui v Landcorp Farming Limited and The Attorney-General
Case information | Mita Michael Ririnui v Landcorp Farming Limited and The Attorney-General SC 47/2015
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that Landcorp’s entry into an agreement to sell Whārere Farm was not tainted by bad faith – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that certain actions of the Office of Treaty Settlements w…
2022 NZHC 832
Red Eagle Corporation Limited v Richard John Otley Ellis
Case information | Red Eagle Corporation Limited v Richard John Otley Ellis SC 72/2009
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – whether the respondent is liable under s 9 of the Fair Trading Act 1986 for passing on information about a third party which induced the appellant to enter into a contact with that third party[2009] NZCA 320 CA 713/2008 24 July 2009
Graeme John Ingram and Elizabeth Knee & Kip Investments Limited v Patrcroft Investments Limited
Case information | Graeme John Ingram and Elizabeth Knee & Kip Investments Limited v Patrcroft Investments Limited SC 72/2010
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Contract – Respondent re-entered property on 14 June 2005, one day before entitled to cancel lease contract for failure by Appellants to pay rent arrears – Whether Respondent cancelled contract under s 8 Contractual Remedies Act 1979 on 15 …
B and others v Crown Health Financing Agency
Case information | B and others v Crown Health Financing Agency SC 72/2008
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Mental Health – Treatment – Statutory Interpretation – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding all informal patients in psychiatric hospitals were within leave and immunity provisions contained in s 6 of the Mental Health Act 1935 and s 12…
Jason John Cumming v The Queen
Case information | Jason John Cumming v The Queen SC 72/2005
Supreme Court
Criminal appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding an accused should be allowed to invoke right of self-representation where their decision was "fully informed and deliberate" whether the trial judges summing up and other interventions during …
B and others v Crown Health Financing Agency
Case information | B and others v Crown Health Financing Agency SC 72/2009 [2009] NZSC 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision