IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
I TE KŌTI MANA NUI
SC 54/2018
[2019] NZSC Trans 25
BETWEEN MATHIAS ORTMANN
First Appellant
BRAM VAN DER KOLK
Second Appellant
FINN HABIB BATATO
Third Appellant
AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
First…
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE v REDCLIFFE FORESTRY VENTURE LTD SC 8/2012 [9
November 2012]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 8/2012
[2012] NZSC 94
BETWEEN COMMISSIONER OF INLAND
REVENUE
Appellant
AND REDCLIFFE FORESTRY VE…
… applicant
and counsel
Panel topic
Interested parties and
counsel
Status
35 Non-
priority
2313
Appeal Arena
Living
Limited
(L Player
Bishop on
instructions
from G
Cleary)
059, 060,
062, 063 -
Residential
08…
… ingoa. Kei kōnei mātou ko Mr Barton, ko Ms Clark-
Tahana mō te Poari Matua o Raukawa, mai te Wairere ki te Raki, tae atu ki te
Pae o Raukawa ki te Tonga, ki te uru o Taupō-nui-ā-tia ki Wharepūhunga, ki
Maungatautari, whakahokia ki (inaudible 10:08…
… Case Name Case Type Nature of Claim Date Filed Date
transferred
from DC
Status of Active Cases
TC - Telephone Conf
IA - Interlocutory
Application
JSC - Judicial
Settlement Conf
Solicitors Disposed SUMMARISED INFORMATION
CIV-2022-409-000581…
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 64/2022
I TE KŌTI MANA NUI O AOTEAROA
BETWEEN R (SC 64/2022)
Appellant
AND The Chief Executive Te Ara Poutama, Department of Corrections
Respondent
SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL
Appeal Hearing: 8 Aug…
… sounds do not have a tendency to prove anything and are
therefore irrelevant under section 7 of the Evidence Act. The disputed
sounds, therefore, are not evidence. Secondly, the sounds, if admitted, have
an unfairly prejudicial effect under section…