R (SC 1/2019) V The Queen
Case information | R (SC 1/2019) V The Queen SC 1/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Search results for Court date
Found 2107 items matching Court date.
Case information | R (SC 1/2019) V The Queen SC 1/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against conviction.
Case information | Jesse-James Winter v The Queen SC 102/2018
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing an appeal against conviction.
Case information | Jeremy James McGuire v The Secretary for Justice SC 22/2018
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Legal Services Act 2011 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in striking out the applicant’s application for judicial review – Whether a self-represented litigant who is a practising lawyer can receive a costs award.
Case information | Mark Robert Sandman v Colin Charles McKay, Roger David Cann and David John Clark SC 35/2018
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them.
Case information | S v The Queen SC 36/2018
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Miscarriage of justice – Whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the appeal on the mode of trial point.
Case information | Craig Duthie and Kirsten Taylor-Ruiterman, and DRK Chartered Accountants Limited v Denise Michelle Roose, and Denise Developments Limited, and DMR Development Limited SC 10/2017
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the causes of action brought by the respondents in tort were not time barred.
Case information | ASG v Harlene Hayne SC 61/2016
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – Criminal procedure Act, s 200 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of "publication" under s 200 – Was information relied on by the employer obtained contrary to an order made under s 200 and if so, does it matter. [201…
Case information | Sportzone Motorcyles Limited (in liquidation) and Motor Trade Finances Limited v Commerce Commission SC 40/2015
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of ss 41, 42 and 44. [2015] NZCA 78 CA 727/2013; CA 593/2014
Case information | Planet Kids Limited v Auckland Council SC 5/2013
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – frustration of purpose – whether the Court of Appeal erred in fact and law in finding that the settlement agreement between the parties was frustrated by the termination of the lease held by the appellant under a clause of the deed of lease…
Case information | Zurich Australian Insurance Limited trading as Zurich New Zealand v Cognition Education Limited SC 58/2013
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Arbitration Act 1996 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law by finding that the test for whether there is a dispute for the purposes of a stay application under Article 8 of the First Schedule to the Arbitration Act 1996 is whether ther…