Search Results
Search results for High court
Found 4373 items matching High court.
SCbuildinginfo
Robert Charles De Bruin v The Queen
Case information | Robert Charles De Bruin v The Queen SC 9/2008
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Appeal against order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1991 - Court of Appeal held that the High Court had correctly calculated a pecuniary penalty order under s 25 of $1 million – whether first appellant more than a mere courier for the purposes of calcula…
James Hardie Industries Plc, James Hardie NZ Holdings & RCI Holdings Pty LImited v Karen Louise White, Waitakere Group Limited, Metlifecare Pinseong Limited, Forest Lake Gardens Limited, Vision (Dannemora) LImited (Name changed to Metlifecare Dannemora
Case information | James Hardie Industries Plc, James Hardie NZ Holdings & RCI Holdings Pty LImited v Karen Louise White, Waitakere Group Limited, Metlifecare Pinseong Limited, Forest Lake Gardens Limited, Vision (Dannemora) LImited (Name changed to Metlifecare Dannemora SC 12/2019
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to find that there is a serious issue to be tried as to whether the applicant owed a duty of care to those affected by the actions or omissions of its subsidiaries – Whether the Court of Appeal was co…
Vincent Ross Siemer v Michael Stiassny and Korda Mentha
Case information | Vincent Ross Siemer v Michael Stiassny and Korda Mentha SC 8/2010
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Defamation – Appellant ordered by High Court to pay $920,000 in damages to Respondents for defamation and breach of contract – Appellant previously found by High Court to be in contempt of Court for breach of interim injunction and failure …
Astrid Eleanor Delany v The Queen
Case information | Astrid Eleanor Delany v The Queen SC 10/2008
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Appeal against order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1991 - Court of Appeal held that the High Court had correctly calculated a pecuniary penalty order under s 25 of $1 million – whether first appellant more than a mere courier for the purposes of calcula…