Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
24 June 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) – Cases where leave granted (121 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 125 KB)
All years
2 September 2011.
The application for leave to appeal is granted.
The approved grounds are whether the challenged evidence was lawfully obtained under s 198 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957 or was, alternatively, properly admissible pursuant to s 30 of the Evidence Act 2006.
25 March 2011
3 and 4 May 2011
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, Gault JJ.
- field media release (PDF, 92 KB)
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, William Young JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is granted.
The approved ground is whether the Court of Appeal has in [2010] NZCA 556 correctly stated the test for corruptly accepting a bribe in terms of s 103 of the Crimes Act 1961.
17 March 2011
____________________
Appeal dismissed.
27 October 2011
18 March 2011
___________________
The appeal is dismissed.
The appellants are to pay the respondent costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements in connection with this appeal, as fixed by the Registrar if necessary.
11 November 2011
- sc 4 2011 mandic lisa marie anor v cornwall park (PDF, 634 KB)
- media release mandic dohnt (PDF, 90 KB)
30 March 2011
_______________________
Appeal dismissed. Costs reserved.
8 November 2011
________________________
Application for recall of judgment of 8 November 2011 is dismissed.
Both applications for costs are dismissed.
9 December 2011
________________________
2nd Application for recall - dismissed.
14 December 2011
________________________
Abuse of process. Dismissed. No further application in relation to [2011] NZSC 133 to be accepted by the Registry.
21 May 2021
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, William Young JJ
22 September 2011
__________________________
A The appeal is allowed and the cross-appeal is dismissed.
B Orders B, C and D of the decision of the Court of Appeal [2010] NZCA 625 are set aside.
C The awards of costs made against Mr Burgess by John Hansen J in the Stream A litigation are set aside and in their place Mr Burgess is awarded $5,000 costs in respect of the first appeal to the High Court heard by John Hansen J.
D Ms Beaven’s gross liability to Mr Burgess is:
(a) Balance due on division of property 3,716.10
(b) Refund of money paid to Ms Beaven 36,804.31
(c) Costs and disbursements on first appeal 5,000
Total 45,520.41
E Ms Beaven is entitled to set off outstanding awards of costs in her favour totalling $15,474.16 against her gross liability producing a net figure which she must pay, and on which Mr Burgess may now execute judgment of $30,046.25. Interest will run on that sum from the date of this judgment in terms of r 11.27 of the High Court Rules.
F Ms Beaven is to pay Mr Burgess usual disbursements in relation to this appeal.
9 August 2012
- sc 9 2011 burgess v beaven media release (PDF, 84 KB)
Blanchard, Tipping, William Young, Chambers, Anderson JJ.
11 April 2011
___________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 September 2011
- sc 11 2011 the attorney general v gow leigh (PDF, 54 KB)
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, Anderson JJ.
A The application for leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved grounds are:
(a) Whether sleepovers constitute “work” under s 6 of the Minimum Wage Age 1983; and
(b) If so, whether the Act is complied with if an employee’ s average rate of pay over a pay period is not less than the prescribed minimum.
19 May 20112 June 2011
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, William Young JJ.A The application for leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved ground is whether the conviction can stand in light of the quashing of the conviction of the person with whom the appellant was jointly charged and her discharge under s 347 of the Crimes Act 1961.
12 May 2011
6 May 2011
__________________
Appeal allowed by consent. Orders for trial by judge alone set aside.
14 September 2011
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, William Young JJ.
B The approved ground is whether the High Court and Court of Appeal correctly interpreted and applied s 361D of the Crimes Act 1961 in directing that the applicants be tried for the offences charged under indictment (Number CRI 2007-085-7842) before a Judge without a jury. 6 May 2011
____________________
Appeal allowed by consent. Orders for trial by judge alone set aside.
14 September 2011
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath, William Young JJ.