Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

24 June 2024

Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) –  Cases where leave granted (121 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 125 KB)

All years

Case name
Dr C v Complaints Assessment Committee
Case number
SC 27/2005
Summary
Summary Civil appeal - privilege - medical practitioners - whether sections 32 and 35 of the Evidence Amendment Act (No 2) 1980 apply to proceedings before the Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal under the Medical Practitioners Act 1995 - whether waiver of privilege. CA 198/04 19 April 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted. Costs to the appellant of $3000 plus disbursements to be fixed by the Registrar in absence of agreement.
22 August 2005
_________________________
A. The appeal is allowed to the extent set out in order C only.
B. The setting aside of the order made in the High Court is affirmed.
C. C's application for disclosure is referred back to the Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal for re-hearing in the light of the directions given in the reasons of the majority judgment. The directions given by the Court of Appeal are set aside.
The appellant must pay the costs of the Complaints Assessment Committee in the Court of Appeal as ordered in that Court. In this Court the respondent must pay the appellant's costs fixed at $10,000 together with disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
29 June 2006
Case name
Bridgecorp Finance Limited v The Proprietors of Matauri X Incorporated
Case number
SC 28/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - appeal against decision of the Court of Appel - whether the effect of s358A of the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 was to restrict a Maori Incorporation's powers to its objects, such that there was a restriction on the Respondent's power to borrow - further seeks declaration that the mortgage is nonetheless enforceable under the Land Transfer Act 1952 and the principle of indefeasibility. CA 8/04 3 May 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
2 June 2005 __________________ A notice of abandonment having been lodged, the appeal is deemed to
be dismissed.
6 November 2006
Case name
Gulf Harbour Investments Limited v Gulf Corporation Limited & Auckland Property Group Limited
Case number
SC 35/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that there had been no valid exercise of an option requiring the transfer of certain land - whether the Court should have departed from the approach in Reporoa Stores Ltd v Treloar and adopted the test of whether a reasonable person would have fairly understood the option to have been exercised. CA 145/04 25 May 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
8 July 2005
Case name
Transotway Limited v Iain Bruce Shephard and Christine Margaret Dunphy
Case number
SC 39/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal arred in concluding that the discharge of a debt by way of set-off through provision of a client list to the applicant was "a payment of money" in terms of s 292(1)(e) of the Companies Act 1993 - whether s 310 of the Companies Act which provides for set-off of mutual debts in liquidation was applicable - whether a substance based approach, which considers the transaction in the context of the agreement as a whole, was applied. CA 98/04 13 June 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted

31 August 2005

Case name
Allistair Patrick Brooker v The Queen
Case number
SC 40/2005
Summary
Appeal against conviction “ disorderly conduct - whether Court of Appeal applied the correct standard for "disorderly conduct" - s4(1)(a) Summary Offences Act “ right to protest. CA 441/03 24 August 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 31 August 2005 ___________________________ Appeal Allowed. Conviction set aside. 4 May 2007
Case name
Scott Simeon Thompson v The Queen
Case number
SC 42/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - appeal against decision of the Court of Appeal - whether the Court erred in dismissing a claim of miscarriage of justice by reason of the complainant’s conduct. CA 445/04 16 June 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 22 September 2005
Media Releases
  • mrt (PDF, 79 KB)
Substantive judgment
Case name
L v The Queen
Case number
SC 49/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - appellant convicted of sexual violation and attempted sexual violation - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial Judge did not misdirect the jury - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding the verdicts were capable of being supported by the evidence – whether the Court of Appeal erred in the standard required for an attempt. CA 115/05 18 July 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted

7 October 2005

Case name
Alain Michael Mafart and Dominique Angela Francoise Prieur v Television New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 50/2005
Summary
Leave to search, inspect and copy criminal records held by the High Court - videotape of Rainbow Warrior proceedings - jurisdiction of Court of Appeal - whether application for leave to search is civil or criminal - whether Court of Appeal jurisdiction precluded by the Judicature Act 1908, s 66. CA 92/05 4 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted 21 September 2005
Case name
Klaus Löwer v Gary Traveller and John Anthony Waller
Case number
SC 51/2005
Summary
Company Law - whether the respondents had an accrued cause of action for reckless trading giving them an "existing right" under s320(1)(b) of the Companies Act - whether the applicant was in breach of s320(1)(b) Companies Act 1955 - whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of ss17-19 Interpretation Act 1999 . CA 36/04 26 July 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted.

2 December 2005

Case name
Wholesale Distributors Limited v Gibbons Holdings Limited
Case number
SC 53/2005
Summary
Construction of lease documents and whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the appellant was bound to meet the contractual obligations of the sub-lessee under the deed of assignment of lease -“ whether the Court of Appeal erred in focusing on the purpose of the parties - “ legal effect of provisions used to avoid the grant of a sub-lease which operates as an assignment of the headlease.CA 102/04 28 July 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted
1 December 2005
___________________________
The appeal is dismissed.
The appellant is to pay the respondent costs of $15,000 together with its reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
30 May 2007