Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
11 July 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 5 July 2024) – Cases where leave granted (123 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 5 July 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
2007
Case name
Manu Chhotubhai Bhanabhai and Douglas Mark Andrew Burgress v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 11/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – as part of an agreement to settle GST arrears arising from the development of an apartment complex, solicitors for property developers gave an undertaking to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue that arrears would be cleared using proceeds from the sale of certain apartment units – in the event, GST arrears not paid – property developers put into liquidation - liquidators commenced proceedings, to which Commissioner was party, against the directors for reckless trading – proceedings settled in favour of liquidators with large cash payment, although no portion of payment could be applied towards the debt owed to the Commissioner – in separate proceedings, giving rise to present application, Commissioner awarded compensation against solicitors in their personal capacity for breach of undertaking – whether factual findings and reasoning at first instance were incorrect - whether the Court of Appeal erred in treatment of certain evidence going towards the nature of the undertaking – whether, given the antecedent proceedings by the liquidators, the claim by the Commissioner amounted to an abuse of process. CA 218/05 20 December 2006
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 26 April 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Unison Networks Limited v The Commerce Commission
Case number
SC 12/2007
Summary
Civil Appeal – appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision that revised price-related thresholds set by the Commerce Commission were lawful and the Court’s refusal to exercise its discretion to grant relief in relation to initial unlawful thresholds – whether the Court of Appeal erred in law by failing to consider whether the Commerce Commission misdirected itself and therefore erred in finding the revised thresholds to be lawful – whether the Court erred in law by finding that the revised thresholds met the statutory purpose and were thus lawful – whether it is appropriate for the Court to decline relief where a statutory body has acted outside the statutory process – whether the Court erred by failing to consider other types of relief. CA 284/05 19 December 2006
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2007
____________________
Appeal dismissed.
Unison is ordered to pay the Commission costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and High Court are to be determined by those Courts in light of this judgment.
10 September 2007
27 March 2007
____________________
Appeal dismissed.
Unison is ordered to pay the Commission costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and High Court are to be determined by those Courts in light of this judgment.
10 September 2007
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment /Media release
Transcription
Hearing date : 18 and 20 June 2007
Blanchard J, Tipping J, McGrath J, Anderson J and Gault J.
Blanchard J, Tipping J, McGrath J, Anderson J and Gault J.
Judgment appealed from
Case name
New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union v New Zealand Fire Service Commission
Case number
SC 13/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to determine the appeal from the Employment Court – whether the Court of Appeal applied the correct test in determining whether certain days would “otherwise be working days” for an employee – whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining the compliance of a collective employment agreement with the Holidays Act 1981 – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of the collective employment agreement – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of s 6 of the Holidays Act 1981. CA 270/05 21 December 2006
Result
A Leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved grounds are:
(a) Whether the Court of Appeal correctly construed the phrase “a day that would otherwise be a working day for the employee” in s 57(1)(b) of the Holidays Act 2003; and
(b) Whether the Court of Appeal was right to conclude that s 57(1)(a) does not require specific agreement between the employer and employee as to a specific day for the taking of an alternative holiday.
17 April 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________
Notice of abandonment being lodged. the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
7 August 2007
B The approved grounds are:
(a) Whether the Court of Appeal correctly construed the phrase “a day that would otherwise be a working day for the employee” in s 57(1)(b) of the Holidays Act 2003; and
(b) Whether the Court of Appeal was right to conclude that s 57(1)(a) does not require specific agreement between the employer and employee as to a specific day for the taking of an alternative holiday.
17 April 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________
Notice of abandonment being lodged. the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
7 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave granted
Case name
K G L v The Queem
Case number
SC 14/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – appellant convicted of sexual and assault offences – whether conviction was supported by the evidence – admissibility of evidence at trial – whether the trial Judge’s summing up led to a miscarriage of justice – application for leave to appeal out of time. CA 60/05 4 November 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 22 May 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
LINDSAY v R SC 14/2007 [22 May 2007] (PDF, 17 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Xiao Quing Huang, Cui Yong Ming and Jarvis Cui v Minister of Immigration and The Attorney General
Case number
SC 15/2007
Summary
Civil – seeking order staying decision of High Court pending hearing of appeal in the Court of Appeal - Ms Huang and Mr Cui are Chinese nationals who came to NZ in 1996 on short-term visitor permits – married and had a son in NZ – 6-year old son is a NZ citizen – removal orders served on Ms Huang and Mr Cui in September 2005 – applied to the High Court for judicial review on humanitarian grounds – effect of removal proceedings on child – application unsuccessful – Mr Cui removed from NZ and returned to China – applicants sought interim relief from the Court of Appeal to delay removal of Ms Huang pending hearing of appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in declining to grant interim relief – whether Ms Huang’s appeal rights rendered nugatory if removed to China – whether balance of convenience favours applicants – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that merits of intended appeal not so strong to favour the grant of interim relief –United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child - United Nations Convention on Civil and Political Rights - New Zealand Bill of Rights Act - application for leave to appeal out of time.CA 236/06 18 December 2006
Result
Notice of Abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 10 May 2007
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Nicola Brownwyn Hayes v The Queen
Case number
SC 16/2007
Summary
Criminal appeal – Crimes Act 1961 – s 229(A)(b) (taking or dealing with certain documents with intent to defraud) – s 228 (dishonestly taking or using document) – whether, and to what extent, the Crown must prove the probability or possibility of “pecuniary advantage” where the accused uses a document to avoid the risk of losing ACC compensation payments to which she, in any event, would have been entitled – alternatively, whether, in that same scenario, the Crown must prove that the accused was no longer entitled to such payments because the relevant incapacity had ceased.CA 343/06 24 February 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
8 May 2007
_________________
Appeal allowed. Conviction set aside. New trial ordered.
15 February 2008
8 May 2007
_________________
Appeal allowed. Conviction set aside. New trial ordered.
15 February 2008
Transcripts
- Hearing date 15 August 2007 (PDF, 273 KB)
Media Releases
- pressrelease hayes 000 (PDF, 89 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
HAYES V R SC 16/2007 [15 February 2008] (PDF, 95 KB)
Case name
F v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Case number
SC 17/2007
Summary
Civil – Appeal against decision to refuse a writ of habeas corpus in relation to the appellant’s child – whether the Court of Appeal failed to consider the evidence before it – whether the Court of Appeal failed to consider international human rights documents. CA 97/07 7 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal refused. 8 May 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
FP v The Queen
Case number
SC 18/2007
Summary
S ummary Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – applicant pleaded guilty in the High Court to seven counts of sexual offending against young girls – whether leave should have been granted for a change of plea – whether language difficulties resulted in a miscarriage of justice – application for leave to appeal out of time.CA 205/05 22 November 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 13 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
F v R SC 18/2007 [13 June 2007] (PDF, 14 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Samuel Tahatu Marsh v The Queen
Case number
SC 19/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – applicant convicted of discharging an airgun in or near a dwellinghouse or public place (s 48 Arms Act 1983) – whether leave should be granted on a direct appeal from the High Court under s 14 Supreme Court Act 2003 – whether Police search of private bedroom was an unreasonable search and seizure contrary to s 21 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, where the Bill of Rights issue was not raised in the Courts below – application for leave to appeal out of time. CRI 2006 419 90 21 November 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
25 June 2007
25 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MARSH v NEW ZEALAND POLICE SC 19/2007 [25 June 2007] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
John Anthony Waller and Richard Dale Agnew v Stephen John Davies and others
Case number
SC 20/2007
Summary
Civil – applicants were appointed statutory managers of CH Finance Ltd pursuant to the Corporations (Investigation and Management) Act 1989 – CH Finance had devised a money lending scheme targeted at homeowners – CH Finance had become the registered proprietor of twelve properties pursuant to this scheme – properties mortgaged variously to the second to sixth respondents – statutory managers applied to the High Court pursuant to s 58 of that Act for directions relating to the twelve properties – statutory managers appealed that decision, cross-appeal by first respondent – statutory managers seek leave to appeal Court of Appeal decision - whether Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the statutory managers’ application for directions under s 58 of the Corporations (Investigation and Management) Act 1989 without providing directions or without remitting the application to the High Court for further directions – whether homeowners have an equitable interest arising out of fraudulent misrepresentations made to them – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that counsel for the first respondent had not conceded that fraudulent misrepresentations had been made – whether the homeowners have an equitable interest arising out of a common law mortgage or an option to purchase – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that first respondent not guilty of fraud under the Land Transfer Act 1952 on the basis that homeowners had no equitable interest to defeat – whether the second to fifth respondents were guilty of fraud by way of imputation and/or attribution –whether costs in respect of the homeowners whose properties were transferred by forgery should be determined by the High Court or Court of Appeal. CA 65/05 7 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs of $2,000 to first respondent, and $2,000 to second to sixth respondents as a group, plus disbursements. 13 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Page 2 of 10