Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
24 June 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) – Cases where leave granted (121 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 125 KB)
All years
Case name
The University of Newlands and Rochelle Marianne Forrester v Nationwide News Pty Limited
Case number
SC 12/2006
Summary
Civil – defamation – jurisdiction – University of Newlands allegedly defamed on Australian website – whether an act or omission for or in respect of which damages are claimed occurred in New Zealand, pursuant to High Court Rules, r 219(a) – whether good arguable case on the merits – whether sufficient evidence of reputation, publication, or damage CA 202/04 9 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
29 March 2006
29 March 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
AMP v MacAlister Todd
Case number
SC 13/2006
Summary
Civil – insurance – solicitor trustee negligently failed to recognise that GST was payable on sale of trust assets – whether solicitor’ s firm entitled to indemnity from insurer – whether Court of Appeal failed to address a principal ground of appeal – whether claim against firm arose “from a trading loss or trading liability incurred by a business managed by or carried on by the insured” – whether claim against own firm by solicitor in capacity as trustee is a claim “made against” the firm – whether causation between solicitor’s negligence and loss – which party has onus to show causation – whether evidential basis to find that trustees would have secured indemnity from trust funds had solicitor not been negligent CA 108/05 15 December 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
4 July 2006
_________________________
Appeal allowed, Judgment entered for the appellant on the respondents claim. No award of costs.
8 December 2006
4 July 2006
_________________________
Appeal allowed, Judgment entered for the appellant on the respondents claim. No award of costs.
8 December 2006
Substantive judgment
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcript
Hearing date : 20 0ctober 2006
Case name
Allan Borley v The Queen
Case number
SC 14/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction for sexual violation and indecent assault – evidence of child complainants – whether sufficient evidence for conviction – whether accused’s decision not to give evidence was compromised due to erroneous advice by trial counsel CA 121/05 12 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
12 April 2006
12 April 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
BORLEY V R SC 14/2006 [11 April 2006] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Trustee Executors Limited v Peter James Murray and others and Morel & Co Ltd and Jennifer Ann Morel
Case number
SC 15/2006
Summary
Civil - allotment of participatory securities - 'payment' of minimum amount within 4 months of registered prospectus - whether the tender and acceptance of a cheque on terms that it be held and its value offset against the amount payable to its drawer on settlement can "be deemed to have been paid" within the meaning of Securities Act 1978, s 37(2)(a) - whether statutory supervisor owes common law duty of care in addition to duty to exercise reasonable diligence imposed by statutory implication and Deed of Participation - whether a duty as trustee of funds received pursuant to an offer of securities can be imposed in addition to an express duty as statutory supervisor - whether exclusion clause in Deed of Participation can exclude liability except for breach of the statutory implied duty to exercise reasonable diligence - whether negligent or inadvertent breach of trust can amount to (equitable) fraud for the purposes of Limitation Act 1950, s 28. CA 86/04 22 December 2005
Result
4 April 2006 – Leave to Appeal granted
Transcript
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment / Media release
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Gillian Moana Buchanan and Lynette Catherine Symes v Chief Executive of the Department of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 16/2006
Summary
Civil appeal – employees dismissed for breach of Inland Revenue Code of Conduct - Court of Appeal dismissed personal grievances and orders for reinstatement made in the Employment Relations Authority and upheld in the Employment Court - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that ignorant non-compliance with Code does not give rise to presumption that actions do not constitute serious misconduct – whether the Court of Appeal erred in stating the test for disparity of treatment by including a third element that the dismissal must be justified notwithstanding the disparity for which there is no adequate explanation – whether the Court of Appeal’ s decision to determine whether there was disparity of treatment on the facts rather than refer the matter back to the Employment Court constituted a substantial miscarriage of justice. CA 2/05 22 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed, costs of $2,500 to respondent.
6 June 2006
6 June 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Peter James Murray and others and Morel & Co Ltd and Jennifer Ann Morel
Case number
SC 17/2006
Summary
Civil - allotment of participatory securities - numerous causes of actions brought against respondents alleging, among other things, an allotment in breach of Securities Act 1978, s 37(2), and issuing a prospectus containing untrue statements in breach of Securities Act 1978, s 56 - causes of action struck out as an abuse of process, being time barred pursuant to the Limitation Act 1950 - whether the doctrine of “reasonable discoverability” should apply to all causes of action. CA 86/04 22 December 2005
Result
4 April 2006 – Leave to Appeal granted
Transcript
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment / Media
Transcript
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Fiona Prasad v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Case number
SC 18/2006
Summary
Civil – social security – beneficiary owner and mortgagor of two flats on same property – beneficiary living in one flat and renting the other out – whether beneficiary’s “accommodation costs” encompasses total outgoings on the property, or only that portion of the outgoings referable to the flat occupied as a home – meaning of “premises” – Social Security Act 1964, s 61E CA 119/04 22 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
10 April 2006
10 April 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Timothy Holden Tipple v The Queen
Case number
SC 19/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence for dealing with a firearm with reckless disregard for the safety of others – Arms Act 1983, s 53(3) – whether purposive approach should be taken to interpretation of criminal offences – meaning of “reckless disregard” – whether recklessness has objective component – whether “deals with a firearm” includes supervising third party use of the firearm – admissibility of evidence obtained by police prior to cautioning – whether verdict unreasonable or not supported by the evidence – allegations of bad faith or bias against police and District Court Judge – consequences of amending indictment mid-trial – effect of facts proved at trial on sentencing – Sentencing Act 2002, s 24(1) – whether entitled to discharge without conviction – Sentencing Act 2002, s 106 CA 217/05 22 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
11 April 2006
11 April 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
TIPPLE v R SC 19/2006 [11 April 2006] (PDF, 17 KB)
Case name
Marlene Patricia Te Wii Haggie v Piki Tawhaki Haggie
Case number
SC 20/2006
Summary
Civil – appeal against Family Court decision on division of relationship property – whether Family Court had jurisdiction to make the orders it did – land listed as general land on certificate of title – argued by applicant in Family Court and High Court that land is customary Maori land and that both courts lacked jurisdiction to determine the issue – whether Privy Council retains inherent jurisdiction under Article the Third of the Treaty of Waitangi or under ss5 and 6 of the Imperial Laws Application Act to determine the status of land – whether status of the land is in question because Crown never “acquired tenure by fair purchase” – whether the extinguishment of the right of appeal to the Privy Council was in breach of Article the Third of the Treaty of Waitangi and the principles of equity in s99 Judicature Act 1908 – whether applicant entitled to appeal to the Privy Council for status orders declaring land in question Maori land – whether Privy Council remains the “court of last resort for native sovereign proprietors” of land – applicant seeks declaration that abolition of appeals to Privy Council ineffective in respect of “native sovereign proprietors”.
Result
Application for leave to amend the application for leave to appeal and Leave to Appeal both dismissed. Costs to respondent of $2,500.
10 May 2006
10 May 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
HAGGIE V HAGGIE SC 20/2006 [10 May 2006] (PDF, 19 KB)
Case name
David John Young v The Queen
Case number
SC 21/2006
Summary
Criminal appeal - conviction under s 45(1) of the Arms Act 1983 for possession of an airgun except for some lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose - Court of Appeal dismissed appeal against conviction - whether Court of Appeal erred in interpretation and application of ss 42 and 48 of the Crimes Act 1961 - whether the Court of Appeal erred in interpretation and application of ss 4 and 27 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 - whether the Court of Appeal failed to address a ground of appeal. CA 266/05 8 March 2005CA
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
6 June 2006
6 June 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
YOUNG V R SC 21/2006 [6 June 2006] (PDF, 16 KB)
Page 224 of 244