Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

24 June 2024

Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) –  Cases where leave granted (121 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 125 KB)

All years

Case name
Paul Burke and Gillian Burke v The Western Bay of Plenty District Council
Case number
SC 34/2005
Summary
Enforcement of contracts - whether there was an agreement to pay the compensation claimed. Supreme Court procedure - whether there a re exceptional circumstances justifying the granting of leave to appeal pursuant to s 14 Supreme Court Act 2003, in circumstances where the Court of Appeal has declined leave to appeal to that Court . CIV 2003 470 356, 18 September 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $2,000 plus disbursement is to be fixed if necessary.
13 July 2005
Case name
Gulf Harbour Investments Limited v Gulf Corporation Limited & Auckland Property Group Limited
Case number
SC 35/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that there had been no valid exercise of an option requiring the transfer of certain land - whether the Court should have departed from the approach in Reporoa Stores Ltd v Treloar and adopted the test of whether a reasonable person would have fairly understood the option to have been exercised. CA 145/04 25 May 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
8 July 2005
Case name
Ada Sharon Pue v The Queen
Case number
SC 36/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal against sentence - whether well-being of offender’ s school-age children given insufficient weight - whether minimum sentence of imprisonment justified under s 86(3) of the Sentencing Act 2002. CA 78/04 19 May 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 10 August 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Body Corporate No 164980 v Paul John Velich
Case number
SC 37/2005
Summary
Unit Titles Act 1972 - Whether a body corporate rule which replaces a default rule under the Act is ultra vires when it appreciably expands the existing powers and duties of the Body Corporate - What the proper test is for determining whether or not any particular rule is "incidental to existing powers or duties" - Whether the replacement rule in fact "appreciably" expanded the powers given to the Body Corporate under the existing default rule. CA 116/04 19 May 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment of application being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed. 15 July 2005
Case name
Pimthong Udompun v Minister of Immigration and New Zealand Police
Case number
SC 38/2005
Summary
Bill of Rights - Whether a failure to make a properly qualified interpreter available is a breach of s27(1) NZBORA - Whether the handing to a detainee a form in the detainee's native language setting out her NZBORA rights satisfied her rights under s23(1) - Whether a Baigent's award of $4000 for breach of s23(5) NZBORA is distinctly inadequate in the circumstances - Whether, having established a breach of the NZBORA, the authority concerned should fully meet reasonable indemnity costs and disbursements - Whether award should be with interest from the date of the breach. CA 244/03 26 May 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 9 February 2006
Case name
Transotway Limited v Iain Bruce Shephard and Christine Margaret Dunphy
Case number
SC 39/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal arred in concluding that the discharge of a debt by way of set-off through provision of a client list to the applicant was "a payment of money" in terms of s 292(1)(e) of the Companies Act 1993 - whether s 310 of the Companies Act which provides for set-off of mutual debts in liquidation was applicable - whether a substance based approach, which considers the transaction in the context of the agreement as a whole, was applied. CA 98/04 13 June 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted

31 August 2005

Case name
Allistair Patrick Brooker v The Queen
Case number
SC 40/2005
Summary
Appeal against conviction “ disorderly conduct - whether Court of Appeal applied the correct standard for "disorderly conduct" - s4(1)(a) Summary Offences Act “ right to protest. CA 441/03 24 August 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 31 August 2005 ___________________________ Appeal Allowed. Conviction set aside. 4 May 2007
Case name
ANZO Foods Waitara Limited, Itoham New Zealand Limited & Riverlands Limited v Affco New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 41/2005
Summary
Encumbrance - interpretation - whether certain meat processing activity within terms of encumbrance - competition law - whether encumbrance prohibited by Commerce Act 1986, sections 27 and 28. CA 181/04 23 June 2005
Result
For hearing 26 July 2005 Notice of abandonment being lodged the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.1 August 2005.
Case name
Scott Simeon Thompson v The Queen
Case number
SC 42/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - appeal against decision of the Court of Appeal - whether the Court erred in dismissing a claim of miscarriage of justice by reason of the complainant’s conduct. CA 445/04 16 June 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 22 September 2005
Media Releases
  • mrt (PDF, 79 KB)
Substantive judgment
Case name
David Fruean v The Queen
Case number
SC 43/2005
Summary
Criminal Law - “ whether a comment by a trial judge describing portions of an out of court statement as "self-serving" during evidence, necessitates a jury direction that "the whole of a mixed out of court statement is evidence of the facts stated". CA 73/05 22 June 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 7 September 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed