Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

24 June 2024

Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024) –  Cases where leave granted (121 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 21 June 2024)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 125 KB)

All years

Case name
The Attorney-General v QBE Insurance
Case number
SC 54/2005
Summary
Insurance - QBE insured Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries under successive 12-month "claims-made" policies - circumstances giving rise to claim occurring under 1998-1999 policy, but claim made under subsequent policy - whether circumstances were notified, or required to be notified, to QBE before expiry of policy – whether QBE estopped from asserting that circumstances were notified, or required to be notified, before expiry - whether policies subject to implied term CA 174/04 3 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed.
10 March 2006
Case name
Whangamata Homes Limited v Peter Martin Jansen and Vivienne Marie Jansen
Case number
SC 55/2005
Summary
Contract law - whether the acts of the appellant amounted to an election to keep the agreement on foot, precluding the appellant from exercising a right to cancel under a sunset clause – whether and to what extent the actions of parties are to be assessed by reference to a) a continuing duty to do all such things as were reasonably necessary for or incidental to the performance of the contract, and b) the intentions of the parties as expressed in the sunset clause. CA 266/04 15 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 3 November 2005
Case name
S v C
Case number
SC 56/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that an order by the Family Court for the appointment of the respondent as counsel to represent children is an interlocutory order - whether the leave of the Family Court is necessary before an appeal against such an order may be taken in the High Court. CA 116/05 18 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 25 October 2005
Case name
Telecom Mobile Limited v Commerce Commission
Case number
SC 57/2005
Summary
Cellphone marketing - whether the applicant's contractual arrangements are subject to the Door to Door Sales Act - whether the applicant's contractual arrangements had the purpose or effect of preventing the operation of the Act by hiding from consumers the reality as to their true rights of cancellation - summary judgment given by Court of Appeal. CA148/04 25 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 23 November 2005
Case name
Paul Rodney Hansen v The Queen
Case number
SC 58/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - possession of cannabis for supply - burden on accused to rebut presumption of possession for supply - whether accused must rebut presumption on the balance of probabilities or merely raise a reasonable doubt - Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(6).
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
24 November 2005
___________________________________
Appeal dismissed.
20 February 2007
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Transcript

Hearing date : 22 February 2006

Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Anderson JJ.

Case name
John Patrick Round v The Queen
Case number
SC 59/2005
Summary
Criminal - whether counsel's alleged failures in cross-examination of the complainant, and not forcefully advising the applicant to give evidence led to a real risk of an unsafe verdict. CA 125/05 29 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 24 November 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Donald Eugene Allen v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 60/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in their interpretation of ss 138B and 89D of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (˜the Act"), which regulate the process which a taxpayer is required to follow if he or she wishes to challenge a default assessment made by a Commissioner under s 106 of the Act - whether the Court was in error in concluding that the Taxation Review Authority had power to strike out the challenge under s 138H of the Act. CA 204/04 8 September 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted.

8 December 2005

Case name
Frederickus Petrus Maria Van Brandenberg v MacGregor Robin Muir and Rosemary Ellen Muir
Case number
SC 61/2005
Summary
Civil District Court Judge acting as an arbitrator - whether Judge’s status conferred upon the parties the benefits of public funding and public facilities in the resolution of their dispute and whether non-statutory rights can be granted to a judicial officer. CA 46/04 6 September 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 8 November 2005
Case name
Robert Arthur Felton and Norah Isabel Felton and others v Annette Frances Johnson
Case number
SC 62/2005
Summary
Relationship property agreement between spouses that has the effect of defeating the creditors of either spouse - whether application to avoid agreement must be made within a two-year limitation period – Property (Relationships) Act 1976, s 47(2)CA 40/04 12 September 2005
Result

Leave to appeal granted.

8 December 2005

Case name
Brett Lionel Allison v The Queen
Case number
SC 63/2005
Summary
Criminal law - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the High Court judge’s finding (that the Crown had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that certain cash was the proceeds of a serious offence or offences) was supported by the evidence - requirements of s257A(2) Crimes Act 1961.CA 20/05 15 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 16 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed