Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
8 November 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 8 November 2024) – Cases where leave granted (126 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 8 November 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 116 KB)
All years
Case name
John Patrick Round v The Queen
Case number
SC 59/2005
Summary
Criminal - whether counsel's alleged failures in cross-examination of the complainant, and not forcefully advising the applicant to give evidence led to a real risk of an unsafe verdict. CA 125/05 29 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 24 November 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
ROUND v R SC 59/2005 [24 November 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Donald Eugene Allen v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 60/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in their interpretation of ss 138B and 89D of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (˜the Act"), which regulate the process which a taxpayer is required to follow if he or she wishes to challenge a default assessment made by a Commissioner under s 106 of the Act - whether the Court was in error in concluding that the Taxation Review Authority had power to strike out the challenge under s 138H of the Act.
CA 204/04 8 September 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
8 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Case name
Frederickus Petrus Maria Van Brandenberg v MacGregor Robin Muir and Rosemary Ellen Muir
Case number
SC 61/2005
Summary
Civil District Court Judge acting as an arbitrator - whether Judge’s status conferred upon the parties the benefits of public funding and public facilities in the resolution of their dispute and whether non-statutory rights can be granted to a judicial officer. CA 46/04 6 September 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 8 November 2005
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Robert Arthur Felton and Norah Isabel Felton and others v Annette Frances Johnson
Case number
SC 62/2005
Summary
Relationship property agreement between spouses that has the effect of defeating the creditors of either spouse - whether application to avoid agreement must be made within a two-year limitation period – Property (Relationships) Act 1976, s 47(2)CA 40/04 12 September 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
8 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcript
Case name
Brett Lionel Allison v The Queen
Case number
SC 63/2005
Summary
Criminal law - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the High Court judge’s finding (that the Crown had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that certain cash was the proceeds of a serious offence or offences) was supported by the evidence - requirements of s257A(2) Crimes Act 1961.CA 20/05 15 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 16 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
ALLISON V R SC 63/2005 [16 December 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Eastern Services Limited v No 68 Limited
Case number
SC 64/2005
Summary
Civil appeal -whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the respondent's claim was not time-barred by the Limitation Act 1950 or by analogy with that section - whether statutory limitation periods are relevant to the Court's discretion in the exercise of the equitable defence of laches -“ whether the Court of Appeal erred in their statement of the test for laches.CA 173/04 20 September 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 9 December 2005
Media Releases
- MR [2006] NZSC 42 (PDF, 88 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Case name
Devanand Solanki v The Queen
Case number
SC 65/2005
Summary
Criminal law - “ assault on a child - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the evidence of the complainant's mother was undisputed - “ trial Judge indicated that a mere touching of the complainant might constitute an assault, and that the jury would have to be so informed.CA 106/05 6 September 2005
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 22 November 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SOLANKI V R SC 65/2005 [22 November 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Robert John Condon v The Queen
Case number
SC 66/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - trial judge's refusal to grant adjournment following withdrawal of counsel leading to accused representing himself at trial - accused convicted and sentenced to imprisonment - whether breach of Sentencing Act 2002, s 30(1) or New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 24 - applicant seeking leave to appeal out of timeCA 373/03 21 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2006
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcription
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Akeel Hasan Abbas Al Biatty v The Queen
Case number
SC 67/2005
Summary
Criminal Law - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that 1) the trial Judge's summing up was not biased; 2) the jury was not placed under improper time pressure to return a verdict; 3) a sentence of preventive detention with a minimum non-parole period of seven years was not manifestly excessive.CA 120/05 17 October 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 16 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Roger Wilson Steele and Christine Lynne Roberts v Eleftarious Serepisos
Case number
SC 68/2005
Summary
Civil appeal – whether the vendor subdivider was entitled to bring the contract to an end or treat it as at an end because the provisions of s 225 of the Resource Management Act 1991 had not been fulfilled within a reasonable time - whether the vendor was obliged to give the purchaser notice of their intention to bring the contract to an end or allow the purchaser an opportunity fulfil the conditions of s 225 of the Act.CA 203/04 12 October 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted to appellant and respondent. 15 February 2006 ______________________________ The appeal is allowed.
The cross-appeal is dismissed.
The orders made by the Court of Appeal are set aside.
In their place we make an order for the entry of judgment in the High Court in favour of the appellants.
The appellants are to have costs in the High Court as fixed by that Court in the light of this judgment, and in the Court of Appeal the appellants are to have costs of $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar of that Court.
The appellants are to have costs in this Court of $15,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar of this Court. 4 September 2006
The cross-appeal is dismissed.
The orders made by the Court of Appeal are set aside.
In their place we make an order for the entry of judgment in the High Court in favour of the appellants.
The appellants are to have costs in the High Court as fixed by that Court in the light of this judgment, and in the Court of Appeal the appellants are to have costs of $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar of that Court.
The appellants are to have costs in this Court of $15,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar of this Court. 4 September 2006
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Substantive judgment
Transcript
Page 244 of 250