Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
11 July 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 5 July 2024) – Cases where leave granted (123 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 5 July 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
F v The Queen
Case number
SC 11/2017
Summary
Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.[2016] NZCA 619 CA247/2016
Result
Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.
8 March 2017
8 March 2017
High Court decision
Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from
not available - suppression orders
Case name
Kathryn Anne Harlen v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Case number
SC 12/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Social Security Act 1964, s 86 – Whether the High Court erred in its view of the Chief Executive’s discretion to decline to recover benefit overpayments.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
12 June 2017
12 June 2017
High Court decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Mark David Chisnall v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
Case number
SC 13/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Public Safety (Public Protections Orders) Act 2014, s 8 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in the formulation of a threshold test for the granting of a public protection orders.
Result
A Leave to appeal is granted (Chisnall v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2016] NZCA 620).
B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicant’s appeal to that Court.
13 April 2017
______________________
A The appeal is dismissed.
B There is no order as to costs.
1 August 2017
B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicant’s appeal to that Court.
13 April 2017
______________________
A The appeal is dismissed.
B There is no order as to costs.
1 August 2017
Transcripts
- Hearing date 22 June 2017 (PDF, 449 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2017] NZSC 114 (PDF, 269 KB)
High Court decision
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Ronnie Joseph de Wys and Penelope Helen Louisa de Wys v The Commissioner of Police
Case number
SC 14/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 ss 50 and 55– Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding the applicants unlawfully benefitted from significant criminal activity.
Result
The applications for leave to appeal are dismissed.
4 May 2017
4 May 2017
High Court decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Mateo Melina Nixon v The Queen
Case number
SC 15/2017
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s conviction appeal – Whether the applicant’ s sentence was adequately reduced.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2 May 2017
2 May 2017
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MATEO MELINA NIXON v R [2017] NZSC 56 2 May 2017 (PDF, 84 KB)
DC judgment
THE QUEEN v NIXON [2015] NZDC 16756 not available
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Richard Lyall Genge v Superintendent of Christchurch Men's Prison
Case number
SC 16/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the High Court erred in failing to grant the applicant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 28 March 2017
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Rhys Richard (Ngahiwi) Warren v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
Case number
SC 17/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Public Safety (Public Protections Orders) Act 2014, s 8 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in the formulation of a threshold test for the granting of a public protection orders.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2 March 2017
2 March 2017
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
B v ALA
Case number
SC 18/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the Employment Court erred in its application of confidentiality provisions in a settlement agreement.
Result
A The application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal is granted but the application for leave is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay costs to the respondent of $2,500. 26 April 2017
B The applicant must pay costs to the respondent of $2,500. 26 April 2017
Employment Court decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Malcolm Edward Rabson v Judicial Conduct Commissioner
Case number
SC 19/2017
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay the respondent costs of $2,500.
5 April 2017
B The applicant must pay the respondent costs of $2,500.
5 April 2017
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Ram Chander Dahiya v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Case number
SC 20/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal for an extension of time.
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant is to pay costs of $2,500 to the respondent. 8 May 2017
B The applicant is to pay costs of $2,500 to the respondent. 8 May 2017
High Court decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Page 88 of 245