Barry Bai and Caoping Ding v Thomas Edmund William James and Iain McLennan, Keaton Pronk and McDonald Vague Limited - SC 1/2022
Summary
Result
B The applicants must pay two sets of costs of $2,500, one to the first respondent and the other to the second respondents.
25 March 2022
_________________________________________________
A The application for recall of this Court’s judgment of 25 March 2022 (Ding v James [2022] NZSC 28) is dismissed.
B The application for leave to appeal in SC 36/2022 is dismissed.
C There is no order as to costs.
11 May 2022
Related Documents
High Court decision — JAMES v NZSOUTHPOLE TEAM LIMITED (In liq) [2021] NZHC 1682 [7 July 2021]
Court of Appeal decision — BAI v JAMES [2021] NZCA 652 [3 December 2021]
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — CAOPING DING AND BARRY BAI v THOMAS EDMUND WILLIAM JAMES [2022] NZSC 28 [25 March 2022] (PDF 174 KB)
Recall judgment — CAOPING DING AND BARRY BAI v THOMAS EDMUND WILLIAM JAMES [2022] NZSC 58 [11 May 2022] (PDF 195 KB)