BRM v The Queen - SC 17/2014

Summary

Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act, s 92 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the prosecutor did not breach their cross-examination duties – Whether the Court of Appeal’s decision in relation to appropriate jury directions was wrong – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the common law partial defence of excessive force is not recognised in New Zealand.[2013] NZCA 657   CA 260/2012

Result

Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 1 May 2014

Related Documents

Additional Information

MCNAUGHTON V R CA260/2012 [2013] NZCA 657   19 December 2013