Ivan Vladimir Joseph Erceg v Lynette Therese Erceg and Darryl Edward Gregory as Trustees of Acorn Foundation Trust and Lynette Therese Erceg and Darryl Edward Gregory as Trustees of Independent Group Trust - SC 17/2016
Media releases
Summary
Result
B The approved question is: Should the conclusion that disclosure not be made/required be set-aside?
17 June 2016
____________
A The appeal is dismissed.
B The appellant must pay to the respondents costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements (to be fixed by the Registrar in the absence of agreement between the parties). We certify for two counsel.
8 March 2017
Hearing Transcripts
Related Documents
High Court decision — ERCEG v ERCEG [2015] NZHC 594 [27 March 2015]
Court of Appeal decision — ERCEG v ERCEG [2016] NZCA 7 [4 February 2016]
Leave judgment - leave granted — IVAN VLADIMIR JOSEPH ERCEG v LYNETTE THERESE ERCEG AND DARRYL EDWARD GREGORY AS TRUSTEES OF ACORN FOUNDATION TRUST [2016] NZSC 69 [17 June 2016] (PDF 9 KB)
Supreme court decision — Non-publication order dismissed: IVAN VLADIMIR JOSEPH ERCEG v LYNETTE THERESE ERCEG AND DARRYL EDWARD GREGORY AS TRUSTEES OF ACORN FOUNDATION TRUST [2016] NZSC 135 [14 October 2016] (PDF 187 KB)
Substantive judgment — ERCEG v ERCEG [2017] NZSC 28 [8 March 2017] (PDF 368 KB)