Parsoa Bahramitash v Stish Kumar and Sunila Kumar - SC CIV 23/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - Conveyancing - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in ordering specific performance - Whether the remedy of specific performance is reserved by clauses 9.5 and 9.7 of the REINZ-ADLS standard form agreement for sale and purchase - Whether clause 4.2(2) provides an exclusive remedy and ousts the application of equitable principles. CA 51/04 8 November 2004
Result
Gault J; Blanchard J. Leave to appeal granted. 3 March 2005 ______________________ Appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $15,000 plus disbursements. Reasons now added. 30 June 2005
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave granted — PARSOA BAHRAMITASH V SATISH KUMAR AND SUNILA KUMAR SC SC CIV23/2004 [3 March 2005]
Additional Information
BAHRAMITASH V KUMAR SC CIV 23/2004 [21 June 2005]
KUMAR AND KUMAR V BAHRAMITASH CA CA51/04 8 November 2004
BAHRAMITASH V KUMAR SC CIV 23/2004 [21 June 2005]