S v C - SC 56/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that an order by the Family Court for the appointment of the respondent as counsel to represent children is an interlocutory order - whether the leave of the Family Court is necessary before an appeal against such an order may be taken in the High Court. CA 116/05 18 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 25 October 2005
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — NZLII : Sharma v Cameron [2005] NZSC 70 (25 October 2005)