Susan Couch v The Attorney-General - SC 49/2006

Media releases

Summary

Civil – appeal against Court of Appeal judgment, striking out claims for misfeasance in public office and negligence – applicant surviving victim of attack in 2001 on Panmure RSA – Department of Corrections acknowledged errors undoubtedly occurred in the handling of attacker’s case – Attorney-General sued on behalf of Department of Corrections – whether Court of Appeal erred in striking out claim for negligence – applicant claiming assailant should not have been allowed or encouraged to work in an ‘inappropriate industry’ – whether Department of Corrections should have better monitored assailant – whether Court of Appeal erred in striking out claim for misfeasance in public office – whether restriction has been placed on state of mind requirement of misfeasance. CA 238/05 17 May 2006

Result

Leave to appeal is granted.
The approved ground is whether the cause of action based on negligence was correctly struck out.
1 September 2006
_________________________
Appeal allowed. Order of the Court of Appeal is set aside and the proceedings are remitted to the High Court for hearing. Respondent to pay to the appellant costs of $27,5000 together with reasonable disbursements. Costs in the lower Courts to be  fixed.
24 March 2010

Hearing Transcripts

Related Documents

Additional Information

COUCH v THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SC 49/2006 [24 March 2010]

Hearing date : 17 April 2007 and

Hearing date : 11 November 2008

Hearing date : 23 March 2009

COUCH V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SC 49/2006 [1 September 2006] 

COUCH v ATTORNEY-GENERAL SC 49/2006 [13 June 2008]

HOBSON & COUCH V A-G CA CA74/05 17 May 2006