The Wanaka Gym Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council - SC 84/2014

Summary

Criminal Appeal – Building Act 2004 – Whether the High Court erred in classifying the residential building as other than a single household unit – Whether High Court erred in holding that the C/AS1 purpose group SA was the appropriate proxy to meet the Building Code fire safety requirements for a residential building – Whether the High Court failed to take proper account of the different criminal and civil standards of proof – Whether the convictions were based on improperly obtained evidence – Whether leave to adduce fresh evidence should be granted. [2012] NZHC 284

Result

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
23 December 2014

Related Documents

Supreme court decision — THE WANAKA GYM LIMITED v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL [2014] NZSC 124 [12 September 2014] (PDF 39 KB)

Supreme court decision — THE WANAKA GYM LIMITED v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL [2014] NZSC 170 [24 November 2014] (PDF 44 KB)

Supreme court decision — THE WANAKA GYM LIMITED v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL [2014] NZSC 172 [26 November 2014] (PDF 47 KB)

Leave judgment - leave dismissed — THE WANAKA GYM LIMITED v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL [2014] NZSC 198   23December 2014 (PDF 52 KB)

Additional Information

Judgment appealed from

The Wanaka Gym Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2012]   NZHC 284